CVE-2026-52946
published 2026-06-24CVE-2026-52946: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to…
PriorityP343high7.5CVSS 3.1
AVNACLPRNUINSUCNINAH
EPSS
0.61%
45.2th percentile
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling
A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in
send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal.
When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both
functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list.
However, they are frequently called from softirq context:
- send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync
- send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ)
The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism:
1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait().
2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in
fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers.
3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception).
4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire
read_lock(&tasklist_lock), deadlocking because CPU 1 is waiting.
Since PID hashing and do_each_pid_task() traversals are already
RCU-protected, the read_lock on tasklist_lock is no longer strictly
required for safe traversal. Fix this by replacing tasklist_lock with
rcu_read_lock(), aligning the process group signaling path with the
single-PID path. This also mitigates a potential remote denial of
service vector via TCP URG packets.
Lockdep splat:
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
[...]
Chain exists of:
&dev->event_lock --> &f_owner->lock --> tasklist_lock
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(tasklist_lock);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&dev->event_lock);
lock(&f_owner->lock);
lock(&dev->event_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Affected
11 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux | — | — |
| linux | linux | >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 54626335ea4174ab2d9a183b511d825f6765e47b | 54626335ea4174ab2d9a183b511d825f6765e47b |
| linux | linux | >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 897d6a7247739fb1528f98c575df4f2e5de7f994 | 897d6a7247739fb1528f98c575df4f2e5de7f994 |
| linux | linux | >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 32dbd5ce4be3a3ed7e00f8af18795cc84fc50a33 | 32dbd5ce4be3a3ed7e00f8af18795cc84fc50a33 |
| linux | linux | >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < b5fa9e32fb6718f70c986ee14dd5d01b4846f331 | b5fa9e32fb6718f70c986ee14dd5d01b4846f331 |
| linux | linux | >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 1bee417678f1135e35b25a37734db46aa94258d2 | 1bee417678f1135e35b25a37734db46aa94258d2 |
| linux | linux | >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 20a93e397abe850c49b6fa0e8cc827b5f634a8f5 | 20a93e397abe850c49b6fa0e8cc827b5f634a8f5 |
| linux | linux | >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < bfcc8e8d8a495bb34cae9e620adfb75fb13a3954 | bfcc8e8d8a495bb34cae9e620adfb75fb13a3954 |
| linux | linux | >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 36c1b57b2ecf3c61ac93f5f07bd29b6f21e226ed | 36c1b57b2ecf3c61ac93f5f07bd29b6f21e226ed |
| linux | linux | >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 00633c4683828acd5256fa8d5163f440d74bbe71 | 00633c4683828acd5256fa8d5163f440d74bbe71 |
| linux | linux_kernel | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.17.5HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vendor_redhat5.5MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
VulDB
Linux Kernel up to 7.1.0 send_sigio injection (WID-SEC-2026-2077)
vuldb·2026-06-29·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2026-52946 [HIGH] Linux Kernel up to 7.1.0 send_sigio injection (WID-SEC-2026-2077)
A vulnerability described as critical has been identified in Linux Kernel up to 7.1.0. This issue affects the function send_sigio. Such manipulation leads to injection.
This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-52946. The attack can only be initiated within the local network. No exploit exists.
Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
GHSA
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send
ghsa_unreviewed·2026-06-24
CVE-2026-52946 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling
A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in
send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal.
When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both
functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list.
However, they are frequently called from softirq context:
- send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync
- send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ)
The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism:
1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait().
2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in
fork() or exit
Red Hat
kernel: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling
vendor_redhat·2026-06-24·CVSS 5.5
CVE-2026-52946 [MEDIUM] CWE-833 kernel: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling
kernel: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling
A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in
send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal.
When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both
functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list.
However, they are frequently called from softirq context:
- send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync
- send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ)
The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism:
1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait().
2. CPU 1 (proce
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00633c4683828acd5256fa8d5163f440d74bbe71https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1bee417678f1135e35b25a37734db46aa94258d2https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20a93e397abe850c49b6fa0e8cc827b5f634a8f5https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/32dbd5ce4be3a3ed7e00f8af18795cc84fc50a33https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/36c1b57b2ecf3c61ac93f5f07bd29b6f21e226edhttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/54626335ea4174ab2d9a183b511d825f6765e47bhttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/897d6a7247739fb1528f98c575df4f2e5de7f994https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5fa9e32fb6718f70c986ee14dd5d01b4846f331https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfcc8e8d8a495bb34cae9e620adfb75fb13a3954
2026-06-24
Published