cbcvebase.
CVE-2026-52946
published 2026-06-24

CVE-2026-52946: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to…

PriorityP343high7.5CVSS 3.1
AVNACLPRNUINSUCNINAH
EPSS
0.61%
45.2th percentile
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal. When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list. However, they are frequently called from softirq context: - send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync - send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism: 1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait(). 2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers. 3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception). 4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire read_lock(&tasklist_lock), deadlocking because CPU 1 is waiting. Since PID hashing and do_each_pid_task() traversals are already RCU-protected, the read_lock on tasklist_lock is no longer strictly required for safe traversal. Fix this by replacing tasklist_lock with rcu_read_lock(), aligning the process group signaling path with the single-PID path. This also mitigates a potential remote denial of service vector via TCP URG packets. Lockdep splat: WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected [...] Chain exists of: &dev->event_lock --> &f_owner->lock --> tasklist_lock Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(tasklist_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&dev->event_lock); lock(&f_owner->lock); lock(&dev->event_lock); *** DEADLOCK ***

Affected

11 ranges
VendorProductVersion rangeFixed in
linuxlinux
linuxlinux>= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 54626335ea4174ab2d9a183b511d825f6765e47b54626335ea4174ab2d9a183b511d825f6765e47b
linuxlinux>= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 897d6a7247739fb1528f98c575df4f2e5de7f994897d6a7247739fb1528f98c575df4f2e5de7f994
linuxlinux>= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 32dbd5ce4be3a3ed7e00f8af18795cc84fc50a3332dbd5ce4be3a3ed7e00f8af18795cc84fc50a33
linuxlinux>= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < b5fa9e32fb6718f70c986ee14dd5d01b4846f331b5fa9e32fb6718f70c986ee14dd5d01b4846f331
linuxlinux>= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 1bee417678f1135e35b25a37734db46aa94258d21bee417678f1135e35b25a37734db46aa94258d2
linuxlinux>= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 20a93e397abe850c49b6fa0e8cc827b5f634a8f520a93e397abe850c49b6fa0e8cc827b5f634a8f5
linuxlinux>= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < bfcc8e8d8a495bb34cae9e620adfb75fb13a3954bfcc8e8d8a495bb34cae9e620adfb75fb13a3954
linuxlinux>= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 36c1b57b2ecf3c61ac93f5f07bd29b6f21e226ed36c1b57b2ecf3c61ac93f5f07bd29b6f21e226ed
linuxlinux>= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 00633c4683828acd5256fa8d5163f440d74bbe7100633c4683828acd5256fa8d5163f440d74bbe71
linuxlinux_kernel

CVSS provenance

nvdv3.17.5HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vendor_redhat5.5MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.

Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.