CVE-2026-9135
published 2026-07-17CVE-2026-9135: IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in…
PriorityP269critical9.9CVSS 3.1
AVNACLPRLUINSCCHIHAH
EPSS
0.84%
56.2th percentile
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integration that bypasses the allow_custom_components=false security control. The vulnerability exists because the validation mechanism only checks the main component source code in node_template["code"]["value"] but fails to validate dynamic CodeInput fields that store generated ToolGuard Python files. Attackers can embed malicious Python code in these unvalidated dynamic fields, which are persisted in Flow.data and later executed server-side when a guarded tool is invoked through the ToolGuard runtime. This allows authenticated users with flow creation privileges to achieve arbitrary Python code execution on the backend despite custom component restrictions. The vulnerability can be escalated through cross-tenant flow manipulation via the agentic MCP update_flow_component_field tool, which accepts attacker-controlled user_id parameters, enabling attackers to inject malicious code into victim users' flows. When combined with publicly accessible flows and specific misconfigurations (AUTO_LOGIN=true, NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true), the attack can be conducted with reduced authentication requirements.
Affected
2 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| ibm | langflow_oss | 1.0.0 – 1.10.0 | — |
| langflow | langflow | >= 1.0.0 < 1.10.1 | 1.10.1 |
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integ
ghsa_unreviewed·2026-07-17
CVE-2026-9135 [CRITICAL] CWE-94 IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integ
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integration that bypasses the allow_custom_components=false security control. The vulnerability exists because the validation mechanism only checks the main component source code in node_template["code"]["value"] but fails to validate dynamic CodeInput fields that store generated ToolGuard Python files. Attackers can embed malicious Python code in these unvalidated dynamic fields, which are persisted in Flow.data and later executed server-side when a guarded tool is invoked through the ToolGuard runtime. This allows authenticated users with flow creation privileges to achieve arbitrary Python code
VulDB
IBM Langflow up to 1.10.0 Policies Flow.data node_template["code"] code injection
vuldb·2026-07-17·CVSS 9.9
CVE-2026-9135 [CRITICAL] IBM Langflow up to 1.10.0 Policies Flow.data node_template["code"] code injection
A vulnerability was found in IBM Langflow up to 1.10.0. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the file Flow.data of the component Policies. This manipulation of the argument node_template["code"] causes code injection.
The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-9135. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
2026-07-17
Published